|
Basics of Investing Glossary Terms | Bond Basics and More - Bloomberg | Dollar Cost Averaging | How to put together your portfolio | Investing
- Motley Fool | Investing in REITs - Bloomberg | Risk Questionnaire | What is a PE Ratio
Quote.com, 01/18/2001
Many people have asked me lately if now is still a good
time to be investing in the stock market. Aren't stocks overvalued?
Aren't we due for a correction, or worse, a crash? Won't
the Y2K problem scare the markets? ?and so on. My answer
to these questions is "Yes, and so what?"
My answer is based on over 20 years of following the market
and studying the results and logic. And what all this tells
me is the following:
- Every investor should continually keep in mind that
the long-term trend of the market is up. If this weren't
the case, investing in the stock market might be no different
than rolling the dice, and we know there is no comparison.
On a short-term basis, there might be some similarities,
but short-term money probably shouldn't be invested in
stocks. A basket of stocks, like the S&P 500 Index,
is a reflection of our underlying economy - energy, technology,
capital goods, utilities, etc. - and it's clear our economy
has a terrific growth bias to it.
- Timing the market ? selling at a top and buying back
in at the bottom is a myth. I know of no one who can successfully
accomplish this consistently. Technical analysts and fundamental
analysts have burned up computers trying to figure out
how to do this. It's hard to be right twice on market movements;
just ask Elaine Garzarelli. She is an astute market analyst
who gained a lot of notoriety by calling the market crash
of October, 1987, but she hasn't had much success with
her calls lately. She has called for two other market corrections
since, that I'm aware of, that haven't materialized. Donald
Trump was another prescient investor who was written about
in the press as having sold his stocks before the "Crash" in
'87. But when did he get back in? He may be still in cash
for all I know. If he didn't get back into the market right
after the crash, he missed some of the best trading days
of the decade. The market did an "about face" after
the crash and began another strong move toward higher ground
that continues today, twelve years later.
- For a 401(k) investor, there is a powerful dynamic process
called "dollar cost averaging" which is involved
in your investment. You have probably heard the term before,
but never realized, and no one ever explained, how important
a process it is. Dollar cost averaging is simply the process
of investing regular amounts of money at regular intervals.
This process causes the investor to buy fewer shares when
the market is dear and more shares when the market is cheap.
Here is an example of the process investing $100 each month.
| Month |
Price |
Shares Purchased |
| January |
$5.00 |
20 |
| February |
10.00 |
10 |
| March |
15.00 |
6.67 |
| April |
10.00 |
10 |
| Total |
$40.00 |
46.67 |
Average share price = $10 (40/4 = 10)
Your average cost = $8.57 ($400/46.67 = $8.57)
As you can see, after investing $100 each month or $400,
your average cost of owning a share is less than the average
price of the shares.
To give you some perspective of how powerful this dynamic
can be, let me show you an example of dollar cost averaging
through one of the most difficult times in our economic history,
the Great Depression. You are probably aware of the "Crash
of ‘29". This is probably the single most important
day in stock market history. Not only did it conclude another
great bull market run, but it also marked the beginning of
one of the worst decades in our history. In the following
example, I invested $1000 a year for ten years beginning
in 1929 and concluded in 1938.
| Year |
Dow Market |
Value |
Shares |
| 1929 |
311 |
$1,000 |
3.22 |
| 1930 |
236 |
1,759 |
4.24 |
| 1931 |
139 |
2,036 |
7.19 |
| 1932 |
65 |
1,952 |
15.39 |
| 1933 |
84 |
3,523 |
11.91 |
| 1934 |
98 |
5,110 |
10.21 |
| 1935 |
120 |
7,257 |
8.33 |
| 1936 |
162 |
10,797 |
6.17 |
| 1937 |
166 |
12,063 |
6.02 |
| 1938 |
132 |
10,592 |
7.58 |
At the end of the decade, 1938, I had invested a total
of $10,000 or $1,000 each year and my 401(k) statement showed
that I had a balance of $10,592, a gain of 6% ($592/$10,000).
Not terrific by any measure, until you look at the Dow Jones
Average and see what happened there. It went from 311 in
1929 when I started investing and ended at 132 at the end
of the ten-year period? a decline of 57%!! There you have
it. The market was down by 57% at the end of ten years and
I was up 6%. Not bad, considering the economic turmoil at
the time.
Impact of Dollar Cost Averaging During the Great Depression
| Impact of Dollar Cost
Averaging During the Great Depression |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Year/Value |
| Year |
Investment |
Dow Value |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
| 1929 |
1,000 |
311 |
$1,000 |
$ 759 |
$ 209 |
$ 209 |
$ 270 |
$ 315 |
$ 386 |
$ 521 |
$ 534 |
| 1930 |
1,000 |
236 |
|
1,000 |
589 |
275 |
356 |
415 |
508 |
686 |
703 |
| 1931 |
1,000 |
139 |
|
|
1,000 |
468 |
604 |
705 |
863 |
1,165 |
1,194 |
| 1932 |
1,000 |
65 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
1,292 |
1,508 |
1,846 |
2,492 |
2,554 |
| 1933 |
1,000 |
84 |
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
1,167 |
1,429 |
1,929 |
1,976 |
| 1934 |
1,000 |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
1,224 |
1,653 |
1,694 |
| 1935 |
1,000 |
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
1,350 |
1,383 |
| 1936 |
1,000 |
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
1,025 |
| 1937 |
1,000 |
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
| 1938 |
1,000 |
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$1,000 |
$1,759 |
$2,036 |
$1,952 |
$3,523 |
$5,110 |
$7,257 |
$10,797 |
$12,063 |
The key to the success of this example is consistency. Staying the course
in spite of all the prevailing economic news and views of the moment. Can
you imagine the intestinal fortitude it took to continue on this course
while the world around you was changing so dramatically? Could a marriage
withstand such pressure? Even my pet dog would probably be disgusted with
me as I continued to invest in my $1,000/year program. In addition to making
money in the stock market during this decade, the rest of my portfolio
(you see, I diversified my portfolio like any smart investor would) was
invested in bonds, high-grade bonds. Bonds, during this time, provided
investors with returns of 5-7% per year. And when you consider that prices
were declining during this period by about 2% a year, my "real" returns
were actually higher than these "nominal" returns. This was one
time when you could have a positive real return if you put your money under
a mattress!
Imagine actually making money during one of the most
horrific times in our history. If dollar cost averaging
can help you do that, then what are you worrying about?
|